[Haskell-cafe] Maintaining laziness
jake at pikewerks.com
Mon Dec 29 14:58:33 EST 2008
Henning Thielemann wrote:
> I found it especially enlightening, that one can avoid a 'force'
> function in a lazy parser by making the possibility of a parser failure
> explicit in its type. I.e. a parser that cannot fail, need no 'force'.
> (I learnt that in polyparse the 'force' function is hidden in 'apply':
I'm curious, what is the difference between using a force function and
using lazy pattern matching?
More information about the Haskell-Cafe