[Haskell-cafe] Logos of Other Languages
tanimoto at arizona.edu
Fri Dec 19 05:43:18 EST 2008
On Fri, Dec 19, 2008 at 2:10 AM, Ashley Yakeley <ashley at semantic.org> wrote:
> All of these get one thing right that the current and most of the proposed
> Haskell logos do not: they don't make any reference to the syntax of the
> language itself. Doing so seems to miss the point of a logo: it's supposed
> to appeal visually, rather than semantically. So I'd like to see some
> submissions that don't use lambdas.
I wholeheartedly agree with you, despite being guilty of charge myself
. : ) Part of the difficulty for us is that much of Haskell's beauty
comes from abstraction, and the notation was created precisely to
capture that, right?
Before I go into some ideas, let me point to some logos that I find very cool:
Perhaps we could contact Conrad for help.
* a hammock, symbolizing laziness
* a banana, borrowing from the popular paper. I suppose lenses or
barbed wire wouldn't be as catchy.
* some blocks fitting together, a la tetris, representing the idea of
* some plumbing, in the same vein as the previous one. I like to
think of Haskell as a series of pipes fitting together, as opposed to
a rube goldberg machine type of flowing.
* an insect or animal: don't know which one, and I assume that beetle
in the new book is trademarked by O'Reilly. Maybe something like
FalconNL's Monica Monad, but a little more serious.
* _|_: just as the joke, but this has the same problem as the lambda.
I suspect it would be much easier if they had decided to stick with
"Curry" as the language name. : )
PS: I'm CCing Conrad, I don't know if he's in this list. Here's the
link so he knows what this is about:
More information about the Haskell-Cafe