[Haskell-cafe] Re: [Haskell] Top Level <-

[Derek Elkins]

On Wed, 2008-08-27 at 02:35 -0700, John Meacham wrote:
[cut]
> 
> However, note the weasel words. Those are in there on purpose, every
> design calls for different solutions. To blanketly say certain
> constructs are just wrong to the point of disallowing them in the
> language, especially when they are common practice at the moment, just
> doesn't seem right.

How can a Haskell user say this?  And this is indeed exactly what
capability languages do.  In fact, this is what almost every language
does (for one thing in common practice or another.)