[Haskell-cafe] the Haskell "with" "pattern"?

[Galchin, Vasili]

Henning,

   Cool ...

thx,

vasili

On Thu, Aug 7, 2008 at 2:13 AM, Henning Thielemann <
lemming at henning-thielemann.de> wrote:

>
> On Wed, 6 Aug 2008, Galchin, Vasili wrote:
>
> >     1) Is there a common assumed semantics across all of the Haskell
> "with"
> > things? withString? withData?
> >
> >     2) If the answer to 1) is yes, then does this imply some kind of
> > polymorphism? Couldn't "with" be "reduced" to a higher order function
> then
> > ??
>
> The Continuation monad abstracts the idea of 'with':
>   http://www.haskell.org/pipermail/haskell-cafe/2008-February/038963.html
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://www.haskell.org/pipermail/haskell-cafe/attachments/20080807/8acb0328/attachment.htm