Fwd: [Haskell-cafe] Hackage Haddock fails where local succeeds
david.waern at gmail.com
Thu Apr 17 13:37:39 EDT 2008
2008/4/17, John Goerzen <jgoerzen at complete.org>:
> On Thu April 17 2008 7:01:18 am Ross Paterson wrote:
> > On Thu, Apr 17, 2008 at 06:45:40AM -0500, John Goerzen wrote:
> > > My local haddock, 0.8, parses this file fine. Is Hackage running and
> > > older version? Could it be upgraded? Or is there something else going
> > > on here?
> > No, it's running haddock 2.1.0, which understands all the GHC
> > extensions, but is more picky about comments.
> OK. I have been able to replicate this behavior with Haddock 220.127.116.11, which
> is the latest according to www.haskell.org/haddock. Where did 2.1.0 come
> Although I can replicate the behavior, I can't explain it. My
reading of the
> Haddock docs leads me to believe I have done the correct thing. Is this a
> bug in Haddock or am I missing something?
It's a bug. Comments on type synonyms were missed when Haddock support
was added to the GHC parser. This might be fixed in future versions of
More information about the Haskell-Cafe