[Haskell-cafe] Re: Function Precedence

[Brandon S. Allbery KF8NH]

On Apr 1, 2008, at 17:07 , PR Stanley wrote:
> I'm beginning to wonder if I fully understand the right  
> associativity rule for the -> operator.

Read a parenthesized unit as an argument:

 > (a -> (b -> (c -> d)))         (((f 1) 2) 3)
 > (((a -> b) -> c) -> d)         (f (1 (2 3)))

-- 
brandon s. allbery [solaris,freebsd,perl,pugs,haskell] allbery at kf8nh.com
system administrator [openafs,heimdal,too many hats] allbery at ece.cmu.edu
electrical and computer engineering, carnegie mellon university    KF8NH