[Haskell-cafe] Re: Very crazy

[Andrew Coppin]

Martin Lütke wrote:
> Dominic Steinitz schrieb:
>>>     
>> Look at the type of (.).(.) which should tell you how to compose functions 
>> with more than one variable. Mind you, I don't think it improves readability.
>>
>> Dominic.
>>   
> Interesting function. It got a sibling: (.)(.) :: (a1 -> b -> c) -> a1 
> -> (a -> b) -> a -> c
>
> Anybody knows how to intepret that? I tried to call it with (++) "t" 
> (++"s") "it" but suddenly got distracted.

All I know is that most of this stuff looks like ASCII art - and perhaps 
I need to see a doctor...