[Haskell-cafe] Re: Is "take" behaving correctly?
andrewcoppin at btinternet.com
Thu Sep 13 14:13:19 EDT 2007
Jules Bean wrote:
> I'm not delighted with the idea of replacing our concise elegant
> standard library names with
> uglyAndRatherLongCamelCaseNamesThatCouldBePerlOrEvenJava though.
> Conciseness of expression is a virtue.
I, on the other hand, I'm not delighted with names such as "Eq" and
"Ord". (Would it be *so* hard to write "Equal" and "Ordered"?) This is
one of the main things I'd have done differently if I'd designed
Haskell... not that anybody is too bothered. ;-)
More information about the Haskell-Cafe