[Haskell-cafe] Re: Proposal: register a package
haskell at list.mightyreason.com
Wed Oct 17 12:23:56 EDT 2007
I disagree with Simon Marlow here. In practice I think Claus' definition of
compatible is good enough:
Simon Marlow wrote:
> Claus Reinke wrote:
>> - consider adding a new monad transformer to a monad transformer
>> library, or a new regex variant to a regex library - surely the new
>> package version can still provide for clients of the old version
> This case doesn't work - if you add *anything* to a library, I can write
> a module that can tell the difference. So whether your new version is
> compatible in practice depends on the client.
One can write such a module. But that is only a problem if the old client
accidentally can tell the difference. As far as I can see, the only two things
that can go wrong are name conflicts and new instances.
New names can only cause compilation to fail, and this can be fixed by using a
(1) adding an explicit import list to the old import statement, or
(2) adding/expanding a hiding list to the old import statement, or
(3) using module qualified names to remove the collision
Fixing this sort of compile error is easy; nearly simple enough for a regexp
script. And the fix does not break using the client with the old library.
Adding things to the namespace should not always force a new API version number.
The new instances normally can do harm as they overlap/duplicate instances
imported/defined elsewhere. So new instances of pre-existing classes should
trigger new a API version number.
<brown bag>I accidentally caused a new release of regex-base/regex-posix to drag
along an instance which caused such a conflict. I rolled back that
More information about the Haskell-Cafe