[Haskell-cafe] Let's do ListT right, finally

Yitzchak Gale gale at sefer.org
Sun Oct 14 18:02:27 EDT 2007


David Menendez wrote:
> If desired, we could easily define a class for commutative monads, and
> then state that ListT m is only a monad if m is a commutative monad.

If we do that, can I suggest that we use some name other
than ListT for that? So far, we seem to agree that most
practical applications use the new ListT.

Thanks,
Yitz


More information about the Haskell-Cafe mailing list