[Haskell-cafe] Re: Exposed module still hidden, why?

Greg Fitzgerald garious at gmail.com
Tue Nov 20 16:16:23 EST 2007

>> Why does GHC still think the package is hidden?
> You need to add "directory" to the Build-Depends instruction in the cabal

Thanks Olivier.  Haddock now builds with this list for 'build-depends':

base>=1.0, haskell98>=1.0, directory>=1.0, process>=1.0, containers>=0.1,
array>=0.1, pretty>=1.0

The 'build' step also requires Happy and Alex to be installed, which are not
mentioned in the cabal file.

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://www.haskell.org/pipermail/haskell-cafe/attachments/20071120/3b91f401/attachment.htm

More information about the Haskell-Cafe mailing list