[Haskell-cafe] Re: Exposed module still hidden, why?
Greg Fitzgerald
garious at gmail.com
Tue Nov 20 16:16:23 EST 2007
>> Why does GHC still think the package is hidden?
> You need to add "directory" to the Build-Depends instruction in the cabal
file
Thanks Olivier. Haddock now builds with this list for 'build-depends':
base>=1.0, haskell98>=1.0, directory>=1.0, process>=1.0, containers>=0.1,
array>=0.1, pretty>=1.0
The 'build' step also requires Happy and Alex to be installed, which are not
mentioned in the cabal file.
Thanks,
Greg
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://www.haskell.org/pipermail/haskell-cafe/attachments/20071120/3b91f401/attachment.htm
More information about the Haskell-Cafe
mailing list