[Haskell-cafe] Re: (Chaos) [An interesting toy]

[Dougal Stanton]

On 07/05/07, David House <dmhouse at gmail.com> wrote:
> represented by a null pointer. So such luck with unboxed types. So
> working with unboxed types is quicker and consumes less memory, but
> don't use them in any kind of high level because the lack of a _|_
> will bite you sooner or later.

I hesitate to say that... it might come back and bite you in the _|_?



I'll get me coat...

D.