[Haskell-cafe] newbie "concatenating" monad question

[Udo Stenzel]

Leandro Penz wrote:
> buildStuff =
>   func1 ++ func2 ++ func3 ++ func4
> 
> My idea is to have a monad with a concatenating >>, so that I can:
> 
> bulidStuff = do
>   func1
>   func2
>   func3
>   func4

buildStuff = concat [
	func1,
	func2,
	func3,
	func4 ]

Remember, functional programming was already useful without monads.

 
-Udo
-- 
"It is the mark of an educated mind to be able to entertain a thought
without accepting it." 
	-- Aristotle
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
Url : http://www.haskell.org/pipermail/haskell-cafe/attachments/20070324/585cd733/attachment.bin