[Haskell-cafe] Re: [Haskell] small boys performance
dpiponi at gmail.com
Wed Mar 14 19:14:33 EDT 2007
On 3/14/07, Andrzej Jaworski <himself at poczta.nom.pl> wrote:
> I am glad you are interested Dan.
> I do not intend to bore anybody with differential geometry but as I was
> pushed that far let me add that if Haskell was made to handle Riemannian
> geometry it could be useful in next generation machine learning research
> where logic, probability and geometry meet.
I believe that you can probably handle (pseudo-)Riemannian geometry in
the framework sketched here:
That only goes as far as playing with vector fields and Lie
derivatives but I think that forms and tensors should fit just fine
into that framework.
There's a simple way to use types to represent tensor products, and
that's sketched here:
(Forget that that's about geometric algebra, the thing I'm interested
in is the tensor products.)
So I'm guessing there's a way of combining these to give a framework
for (pseudo-)Riemannian geometry. But it'd only be a good framework
for answering certain types of questions - in particular for things
like numerical simulation. The important thing is that you'd be able
to read off accurate numerical values of quantities like curvatures
without any need for symbolic algebra.
More information about the Haskell-Cafe