[Haskell-cafe] let vs do?
lgreg.meredith at biosimilarity.com
Thu Jun 28 15:17:51 EDT 2007
Once you have a polymorphic let, why do you need 'let' in the base language,
at all? Is it possible to formulate Haskell entirely with do-notation where
there is a standard monad for let environments? Probably this was all
discussed before in the design deliberations for the language standard.
Pointers would be very much appreciated.
505 N 72nd St
Seattle, WA 98103
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the Haskell-Cafe