[Haskell-cafe] Haskell & monads for newbies

Hugh Perkins hughperkins at gmail.com
Sat Jul 14 15:34:20 EDT 2007

Well, can you provide an example of an implementation of bind that satisfies
an intuitive definition of bind but does not satisfy the monad laws?

On 7/14/07, Derek Elkins <derek.a.elkins at gmail.com> wrote:

> -Documentation- damn well better have the monad laws.  Something is not
> a monad if it does not satisfy the monad laws.  Furthermore, the monad
> laws are almost the only thing that -does- define monads.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://www.haskell.org/pipermail/haskell-cafe/attachments/20070714/651bcd7f/attachment.htm

More information about the Haskell-Cafe mailing list