[Haskell-cafe] Functional dependencies *not* part of the next Haskell standard?

[Jules Bean]

Simon Peyton-Jones wrote:
> | I think the implementation is some 90% complete though, in GHC head.
> | Certainly you can write many associated types programs already -- the
> | missing part is finishing off associated type synonyms, iirc.
> 
> ...and we have a working implementation of that too, thanks to Tom Schrijvers.  It's not in the HEAD yet, but it will be in a few weeks.


Excellent news!

Jules