[Haskell-cafe] In-place modification

[Andrew Coppin]

Sebastian Sylvan wrote:
> On 10/07/07, Jon Harrop <jon at ffconsultancy.com> wrote:
>> Both are designed for GUI and web programming, so they don't fare 
>> well for
>> massive concurrency, high-performance numerics or allocation-intensive
>> algorithms (e.g. idiomatic functional programming).
>
> C# 3.0 gets it a bit closer, though. I wonder what C# 4.0 will look
> like, though I worry about the complexity of the language when they
> keep tacking stuff on like that.

The thing that I *like* about Haskell is that it manages to be very 
powerful, and yet elegently simple. :-D

(...and then they add MPTCs, GADTs, ATs, ETs, Rank-N polymorphism, FDs...)