[Haskell-cafe] CPS versus Pattern Matching performance
Donald Bruce Stewart
dons at cse.unsw.edu.au
Tue Jul 10 05:01:14 EDT 2007
lemming:
>
> On Tue, 10 Jul 2007, Tony Morris wrote:
>
> > Is your explanation specific to maybe? Or does that apply to all functions?
> >
> > Suppose the following function for lists:
> >
> > f :: [a] -> b -> (a -> [a] -> b) -> b
> >
> > ...instead of pattern matching [] and (x:xs)
>
> A foldr without recursion. I use such functions frequently in order to
> hide constructors of a data type. Does this kind of functions has a common
> name?
They're catamorphisms:
Bool - cond/if-then-else
Maybe - maybe
(,) - uncurry
[] - foldr
-- Don
More information about the Haskell-Cafe
mailing list