[Haskell-cafe] Strange type behavior in GHCi 6.4.2
Bulat Ziganshin
bulat.ziganshin at gmail.com
Mon Jan 1 05:55:56 EST 2007
Hello Lennart,
Sunday, December 31, 2006, 10:26:24 PM, you wrote:
> I think you can be much more productive in optimizing your code
> if you actually understand what's going on. I usually don't go as
> far as looking at compiler intermediate code; I usually stick with
> profiling (or look at assembly code if it's a really performance
> critical inner loop).
for GHC??? :) if we say about optimizing C programs, old days i usually
looked into asm code and then darken and go to rewrote it in asm :)
nowadays i look only at memory access patterns, it's enough, at least for a
few programs i optimized this year
for GHC, i usually know which functions need to become faster, so i
personally don't need profiling. moreover, program should be optimized for
wide variety of situations, while profiling run shows only one execution
scenario.
i don't think that looking into STG (don't even said about C--/asm) may
help me to optimize program. which program-specific things i can find here,
after i've once learned how generation of STG code works?
> Then you can start optimizing. That can be
> by changing algorithm, changing data representation, strictness
> annotations, etc.
yes, i don't use profiling because i use more specific instruments to
investigate performance bottlenecks
> It can also be by inserting some INLINE or SPECIALIZE
> pragmas, but that's more rare (don't get me wrong about those pragmas,
> I introduced them in Haskell with hbc). But I think just adding pragmas
> willy-nilly is a bad idea; I find that most serious performance problems
> cannot be solved by those means, instead you need a higher level
> approach.
i proposed it as fast approach to raise performance, as alternative to your
suggestion to profile and read code, where you not said anything about
changing algorithms :)
--
Best regards,
Bulat mailto:Bulat.Ziganshin at gmail.com
More information about the Haskell-Cafe
mailing list