[Haskell-cafe] Splitting Hairs Over Terminology
catamorphism at gmail.com
Mon Feb 26 22:56:11 EST 2007
On 2/26/07, Dan Weston <westondan at imageworks.com> wrote:
> P. R. Stanley wrote:
> > In C, for example, iteration could be implemented using the if construct
> > with the dreaded goto command. So, strictly speaking, the while loop
> > could be classed as syntax sugar. Yet, the while loop is a
> > well-recognized construct in its own right.
> > I hope you can see what I'm driving at.
> Syntactic sugar is fully desugared at compile time. A while loop with
> constant limits *could* be considered syntactic sugar if the compiler
> can statically unroll the loop. Variable limits are definitely beyond
> this definition, since they can only be evaluated at runtime.
I think what P.R. meant is that while loops in C can be desugared like this:
No static unrolling of the loop happens. So in the sense of "syntactic
sugar" that means "a construct that can be defined in terms of other
language constructs", while is syntactic sugar in C.
Not sure what the original point was, though.
Kirsten Chevalier* chevalier at alum.wellesley.edu *Often in error, never in doubt
"Are you aware that rushing toward a goal is a sublimated death wish? It's no
coincidence we call them 'deadlines'." -- Tom Robbins
More information about the Haskell-Cafe