[Haskell-cafe] Summarize of Why do I have to specify (Monad m) here again?

David Tolpin david.tolpin at gmail.com
Sun Feb 18 16:37:34 EST 2007

On Mon, 19 Feb 2007 02:17:34 +0400, Marc Weber <marco-oweber at gmx.de> wrote:

> Thanks for all the feedback. It did help me a lot.
> Now I know that if there is something left to discuss the topic should
> be:
> Would it make sense to specify partial type declarations ?
> I don't need an answer right now.

Hi Marc,

no, it wouldn't. It would make sense to draw the arrow in the class definition in the opposite direction. It does not point in the direction it should in the class case.


More information about the Haskell-Cafe mailing list