[Haskell-cafe] Re: Importance of MonadRandom

[Yitzchak Gale]

OK, thanks!

Regards,
Yitz

Cale Gibbard wrote:
> The splittable idea isn't mine, it looks like perhaps Remi Turk did it.
>
> One thing which I'd recommend is including getRandom, getRandomR as
> implemented in terms of getR and the ordinary random operations,
> simply because they're the two most common uses, it's probably worth
> it to define them separately. Also, getRandoms and getRandomRs would
> still be convenient to have in the library, and should do appropriate
> splitting of the generator.