[Haskell-cafe] Re: nested maybes

[Benjamin Franksen]

Udo Stenzel wrote:
> Sure, you're right, everything flowing in the same direction is usually
> nicer, and in central Europe, that order is from the left to the right.
> What a shame that the Haskell gods chose to give the arguments to (.)
> and ($) the wrong order!

But then application is in the wrong order, too. Do you really want to write
(x f) for f applied to x?

Ben