[Haskell-cafe] Doing some things right
andrewcoppin at btinternet.com
Sat Dec 29 05:32:54 EST 2007
Luke Palmer wrote:
> OO is orthogonal to functional. Erlang is pure functional, Lisp is a
> bastard child...
1. Wasn't Lisp here first? (I mean, from what I've read, Lisp is so old
it almost predates electricity...)
2. I'm curios as to how you can have a functional OO language. The two
seem fundamentally incompatible:
- FP could be defined as "programming without mutable state".
- In OOP we have the definition: "An object has identity, state and
That a state has an *identity* more or less demands *mutable* state. So
OOP is programming with mutable state inside objects, and FP is
programming without mutable state. Hmm...
3. I know very little about Erlang, but the Haskell wiki claims it is
not pure functional. (This agrees with the small amount of Erlang I do
More information about the Haskell-Cafe