[Haskell-cafe] Re: Re: type class question
peter.padawitz at udo.edu
Fri Dec 7 10:57:04 EST 2007
Jules Bean wrote:
> Peter Padawitz wrote:
>> Functional dependencies don't work in my case. Actually, I don't see
>> why they should.
> Ah well, it's cruel to say that without explaining to us why!
Cause I don't see why the instantiation conflicts pointed out by others
would vanish then.
> I'm not sure why a complete cyclic dep a -> b -> c -> d -> a isn't
> what you want.
>> What seems to be needed here is a type class construct with a kind of
>> record parameter so that instance conflicts cannot occur.
> I'm not entirely sure what you intend to mean by this, but if you mean
> what I guess you mean:
> class Java (a,b,c,d) where ....
Yeah... but ghc accepts only type variables here, not arbitrary
More information about the Haskell-Cafe