[Haskell-cafe] let and fixed point operator
paul.hudak at yale.edu
Fri Aug 31 12:00:41 EDT 2007
> What is so bad about
> f x = g x''
> where x'' = x' + transform
> x' = x * scale
> (if you really hate inventing temporary names, that is).
There's nothing at all wrong with this, assuming it's what you meant to
type :-), and it might even correspond perfectly to the mathematical
notation used in some textbook. But I would argue that this example is
pretty simple, and that if there were a lot of xs and x's and x''s then
the chance of making a typing mistake is greater, I believe, than if you
had used x, xscaled, and xtransformed. (On the other hand this is all
pretty subjective... :-)
More information about the Haskell-Cafe