[Haskell-cafe] Re: "quoting" in Haskell
Rene de Visser
Rene_de_Visser at hotmail.com
Mon Aug 27 15:05:01 EDT 2007
"Peter Verswyvelen" <bf3 at telenet.be> schrieb im Newsbeitrag
news:46D2E7F1.9080905 at telenet.be...
> In Scheme, on can "quote" code, so that it becomes data. Microsoft's F#
> and C# 3.0 also have something similar that turns code into "expression
> trees". The latter is used extensively in LINQ which translates plain C#
> code into SQL code or any other code at runtime (this idea came from FP I
> heared)
The normal way of doing such things in Haskell is to have
1) functions that generate the component data structures (these functions
are often called smart constructors)
2) other functions to put the functions/data structures together (these
other functions are often call combinators).
The resulting data structure that represents the sql query for example is
then processed to produce the real (textual) sql query which this then sent
to the database.
>
> I can't find something similar for Haskell? Maybe I am looking at the
> wrong places?
HaskellDB for example does this for database queries.
Parsec does this parsers.
HSXML (if I got the name right) does this for XML.
>
> In Haskell, I know one can use a data constructor as a function (as in
> (map Just [1..3])), but a function cannot be turned into a data
> constructor (= "quoting"), can it?
A data constructor is a special case of a function, or perhaps better said,
a particular way a function is defined. Either a function is a data
constructor or it isn't.
For example you can also do
just = Just
Just is a data constuctor. It was defined with a data statement (and as a
result starts with a capital letter).
data Maybe a = Nothing | Just a
just is not a data constructor. Why? It wasn't defined with a data
statement.
However just and Just behave almost identically. (you can't pattern match on
just, only on Just)
Rene.
More information about the Haskell-Cafe
mailing list