[Haskell-cafe] is there a way to patch the build-depends line of a
cabal file without breaking backwards compatibility?
Thomas Hartman
thomas.hartman at db.com
Mon Aug 20 14:58:31 EDT 2007
> Take a look at the Cabal.cabal file, how this is solved, atm.
where is this, how can I take a look at it?
> The next release of Cabal (and the current HEAD) supports conditionals
I couldn't install head, but since I'm running 6.7, do I already have it?
hartthoma at linuxpt:~/installs/cabal-head/cabal>runghc Setup.lhs configure
Distribution/Simple/InstallDirs.hs:267:36:
Not in scope: `dropDrive'
hartthoma at linuxpt:~/installs/cabal-head/cabal>ls -l `which ghc`
lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 31 2007-08-20 11:08 /usr/local/bin/ghc ->
/usr/local/bin/ghc-6.7.20070816
hartthoma at linuxpt:~/installs/cabal-head/cabal>ghc-pkg list | grep -i cabal
Cabal-1.1.7
> Please also note that this might not be the
> best way to use the new features; as I suggested in another thread,
> simulating base-1.0 on systems with base-2.0 is probably best handled
> with a base.cabal file that imports base-2.0, old-time, etc. and re-
> exports all imported modules to get a "virtual" base-1.0.
I'm interested in seeing how this works, but I couldn't find that other
thread.
Where is the documentation for the new functionality in cabal head, or do
you just have to read the source code for now?
thanks, t
Thomas Schilling <nominolo at googlemail.com>
08/20/2007 01:37 PM
To
Thomas Hartman/ext/dbcom at DBAmericas
cc
haskell-cafe <haskell-cafe at haskell.org>
Subject
Re: [Haskell-cafe] is there a way to patch the build-depends line of a
cabal file without breaking backwards compatibility?
On 20 aug 2007, at 18.37, Thomas Hartman wrote:
>
> cafe, is there a way to patch the build-depends line of a cabal
> file without breaking backwards compatibility?
>
> I just patched HDBC head to compile under ghc 6.7. Unfortunately it
> now won't compile in 6.6.1.
>
> is there a way for build-depends to detect which version of ghc
> you're on?
>
> also I seem to recall that -fglasgow-exts was deprecated under 6.7.
> is there a better way to beat back the error message below than this?
>
The next release of Cabal (and the current HEAD) supports
conditionals to test for flags, os/arch, and implementation
(+version). Note that the problem isn't the GHC version, but the new
base version, in which the old base was split up into smaller
packages, so we have something roughly like: base-1.0 = base-2.0 +
bytestring + old-time + mtl. Take a look at the Cabal.cabal file,
how this is solved, atm. Please also note that this might not be the
best way to use the new features; as I suggested in another thread,
simulating base-1.0 on systems with base-2.0 is probably best handled
with a base.cabal file that imports base-2.0, old-time, etc. and re-
exports all imported modules to get a "virtual" base-1.0.
/ Thomas
---
This e-mail may contain confidential and/or privileged information. If you
are not the intended recipient (or have received this e-mail in error)
please notify the sender immediately and destroy this e-mail. Any
unauthorized copying, disclosure or distribution of the material in this
e-mail is strictly forbidden.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://www.haskell.org/pipermail/haskell-cafe/attachments/20070820/db566db5/attachment.htm
More information about the Haskell-Cafe
mailing list