[Haskell-cafe] Re: a regressive view of support for imperative
programming in Haskell
isaacdupree at charter.net
Mon Aug 13 12:27:45 EDT 2007
David Roundy wrote:
> The only cost is that
> this syntax relies on the do notation, and thus makes the desugaring of
> that do notation slightly more complicated when used.
If I understand correctly,
bar (<- action)
has an ambiguity: which do-block is the action bound in? I can easily
imagine myself being frustrated at having to refactor my code if the
defined answer is not the one I want at the moment.
More information about the Haskell-Cafe