[Haskell-cafe] Re: monad subexpressions

[Brandon S. Allbery KF8NH]

On Aug 4, 2007, at 14:51 , Bulat Ziganshin wrote:

> Hello Brandon,
>
> Saturday, August 4, 2007, 8:44:46 PM, you wrote:
>
>> That would be why I'm using a language which lets me compose things
>> in complex ways.  And just once, abstracting it away into a library,
>> which you seem to be missing.
>
> and you hate 'do' syntax sugar?

Not particularly; I use both do and >>= (even intermixing them),  
although I'm uncertain that *teaching* Haskell should start with the  
"do" notation.  Your point being?

-- 
brandon s. allbery [solaris,freebsd,perl,pugs,haskell] allbery at kf8nh.com
system administrator [openafs,heimdal,too many hats] allbery at ece.cmu.edu
electrical and computer engineering, carnegie mellon university    KF8NH