[Haskell-cafe] don't: a 'do' for comonads?

[Marc A. Ziegert]

don't :: a
don't = error "D'oh!"

- marc



Am Donnerstag, 9. November 2006 04:47 schrieb Donald Bruce Stewart:
> As seen on #haskell, from an idea by Malcolm,
> 
>     14:42  ?let top'n'tail = ("<pre>"++) . (++"</pre>") 
>     14:42  lambdabot> Defined.
>     14:43  dons> > L.top'n'tail "foo me now"
>     14:43  lambdabot>  "<pre>foo me now</pre>"
>     14:43  mauke> that reminds me, haskell needs don't
>     14:43  dons> yes!
>     14:44  pkhuong-> mm. the opposite of do, eh? do for comonads? :)
> 
> So now a prize to the person who comes up with the best use for the
> identifier:
> 
>     don't :: ?
> 
> -- Don
> _______________________________________________
> Haskell-Cafe mailing list
> Haskell-Cafe at haskell.org
> http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe
> 
>