[Haskell-cafe] Baffled by Disk IO
SevenThunders
mattcbro at earthlink.net
Sat Jul 29 19:16:40 EDT 2006
SevenThunders wrote:
>
> I have run into a baffling distinction between the behavior of GHCi and
> the compiled binary from GHC.
> I suspect it's something pretty stupid on my part.
>
> I have the following test program
> <test.hs>
> import Matrix
>
> main = let
> f1 = bRgauss 4 3
> f2 = bRgauss 3 2
> fu = f1 *. f2
> in bsave "fumat" fu
> ----------------------------------
> The type signature of bsave is
>
>
> -- | save a matrix to a file
> bsave :: String -> m -> IO()
> bsave str z = do
> k <- matindx z
> withCString str (\x -> bmsave x k)
>
> and bmsave is a C routine that does a simple write to disk using fprintf.
> If I compile using GHC and run this as test.exe it does absolutely
> nothing, no file is actually saved. In fact no file is saved even
> if I try to print components of fu in the IO monad.
>
> Whereas if I load it into GHCi and run main, everything works as
> expected. Well sort of. Apparently everytime I extract something out
> of fu and use it in an IO monad it executes all the IO actions in fu, so
> it's easy to get unwanted behavior with incautious use.
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Haskell-Cafe mailing list
> Haskell-Cafe at haskell.org
> http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe
>
>
OK it was stupid. Apparently GHC behaves differently according to what the
name of the high level source file is. If I renamed test.hc to main.hc
everything works the same as GHCi. I probably should actually read the
manual some day.
--
View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Baffled-by-Disk-IO-tf2021760.html#a5559084
Sent from the Haskell - Haskell-Cafe forum at Nabble.com.
More information about the Haskell-Cafe
mailing list