[Haskell-cafe] forall and a parse error

David House dmhouse at gmail.com
Mon Jul 3 14:50:04 EDT 2006

On 03/07/06, Neil Mitchell <ndmitchell at gmail.com> wrote:
> In normal Haskell, I tend to view [x] as equivalent to [(x)] (provided
> that x is not a tuple) but in this case it has a different meaning -
> albeit both are erronous meanings.

How would tuples make a difference?

-David House, dmhouse at gmail.com

More information about the Haskell-Cafe mailing list