[Haskell-cafe] unary pattern matching

[John Meacham]

On Fri, Jan 27, 2006 at 04:57:14AM -0500, Cale Gibbard wrote:
> Or if we're going to allow @ as an infix operator, we could use (@
> pat), reminiscent of section notation. (exp @) of course would make no
> sense, seeing as there's no representation for patterns as values.

oooh. I like that. what fixity do you think @ should have? perhaps even
lower than $... 
        John

-- 
John Meacham - ⑆repetae.net⑆john⑈