[Haskell-cafe] Shootout rankings
Donald Bruce Stewart
dons at cse.unsw.edu.au
Sun Jan 15 18:28:44 EST 2006
jupdike:
> > > Maybe we finally have enough motivation to move to
> > > some other measurement of program volume :-)
>
> > I'm not sure how you could do this better, though... Maybe counting
> > the number of "tokens" (not sure how you'd define that though)
>
> I was thinking the same thing for the past few weeks: that lexemes or
> lexical tokens would be the ideal unit of conciseness in a programming
> language. This is revealing:
>
> >From the shootout, for ackermann (counted by hand, given the benefit
> of the doubt (i.e. to yield shorter count), excuse any mistakes):
> language lines lexemes (non-whitespace, non-comment tokens)
> Haskell 7 78
> Python 10 79*
> OCaml 6 87
> Standard ML 4 88
Ah! Just as I thought, SML really was trying very hard ;)
> Tcl 12 89**
> Nice 7 93
> Perl 9 95***
> c/gcc 8 100****
> Java 7 109
> D Digital Mars 9 113
> Scheme 11 113
-- Don
More information about the Haskell-Cafe
mailing list