[Haskell-cafe] Re: Hashtable woes
simonmarhaskell at gmail.com
Tue Feb 21 07:09:17 EST 2006
Brian Sniffen wrote:
> On 2/10/06, Ketil Malde <ketil.malde at bccs.uib.no> wrote:
>>Hmm...perhaps it is worth it, then? The benchmark may specify "hash
>>table", but I think it is fair to interpret it as "associative data
>>structure" - after all, people are using "associative arrays" that
>>(presumably) don't guarantee a hash table underneath, and it can be
>>argued that Data.Map is the canonical way to achieve that in Haskell.
> Based on this advice, I wrote a k-nucleotide entry using the rough
> structure of the OCaml entry, but with the manual IO from Chris and
> Don's "Haskell #2" entry. It runs in under 4 seconds on my machine,
> more than ten times the speed of the fastest Data.HashTable entry.
I haven't been following this too closely, but could someone provide me
with (or point me to) the badly performing Data.HashTable example, so we
can measure our improvements?
More information about the Haskell-Cafe