tomasz.zielonka at gmail.com
Mon Dec 18 12:12:42 EST 2006
On Mon, Dec 18, 2006 at 04:59:45PM +0000, Joachim Breitner wrote:
> Well, that???s a possible implementation of a maybeToM. The question is:
> Is it useful enough for a name on it???s own?
...and for putting it in Prelude?
It would be interesting to try to estimate the number of functions
useful enough for putting in Prelude - I am starting to be afraid
that there will be too many of them.
One of the nice things about functional languages is that you can create
such functions by combining higher-order functions, without the need to
name the resulting function.
Maybe we could agree to put in Prelude only the N (200? 1000?) most
useful functions ;-)
I am not sure about maybeToM - maybe it will be found useful to many.
More information about the Haskell-Cafe