"class []" proposal Re: [Haskell-cafe] One thought: Num to 0as ? to list?

Tue Aug 22 14:21:13 EDT 2006

Hello Brian,

Tuesday, August 22, 2006, 9:35:21 PM, you wrote:

> I feel "if it ain't broken don't fix it", and not only is the existing
> syntax not broken, it's already (imho) absolutely perfect in it's clarity
> and consistency

it's because you not programmed a lot with type classes. if you start,
you will soon realize that type signatures with classes are just
unreadable. just look at sources of my streams library

-- 
Best regards,
 Bulat                            mailto:Bulat.Ziganshin at gmail.com