[Haskell-cafe] Haskell versus Lisp
glynn at gclements.plus.com
Fri Sep 16 09:29:33 EDT 2005
David Roundy wrote:
> > Bearing this in mind, and hoping you can see where I'm coming from, I
> > think my question is: shouldn't you guys be using Lisp?
> Lisp is impure, weakly typed and has way too many parentheses. Why would
> we use lisp? It seems to be lacking almost all the advantages of Haskell,
> and have an ugly, inflexible syntax to boot.
The ability to dynamically generate, manipulate and analyse code in a
structured manner provides a flexibility which is unmatched by any
other language I know of.
A good example is Emacs; lisp is entirely the right language for that,
Glynn Clements <glynn at gclements.plus.com>
More information about the Haskell-Cafe