[Haskell-cafe] Re: matrix computations based on the GSL

[Henning Thielemann]

On Fri, 8 Jul 2005, Keean Schupke wrote:

> Henning Thielemann wrote:
>
> >>does it not make sense to define matrix applicaion:
> >>
> >>    mapply :: Matrix -> Vector -> Vector
> >>
> >>Then you can define say:
> >>
> >>    rotate90 = mapply rotationMatrix90
> >>
> >>    v' = rotate90  v
> >
> >... that's what I said about mulVec.
> >
> I guess that means we agree...

... yes, and that I wonder if you read my former mails. I feel I'm
repeating myself.