[Haskell-cafe] Efficiency Question

Stefan Holdermans sholderm at students.cs.uu.nl
Sat Jan 15 04:41:40 EST 2005


> I think these operators should be more related to ":" like ":&" "&:" 
> or similar. However, in my opinion this special cons operators could 
> be just functions with a meaningful name like "consfst" and "conssnd". 
> It would provide much more readability.

And (:&) would of course be illegal anyway.



More information about the Haskell-Cafe mailing list