[Haskell-cafe] Re: Yet another IO initializer: Effectful
declarations and an ACIO monad
Jules Bean
jules at jellybean.co.uk
Fri Nov 26 09:12:57 EST 2004
On 26 Nov 2004, at 12:08, George Russell wrote:
> > Yes, you need to explicitly initialise it; but you don't need then
> to
> > pass the initialized handle all around your code. The painful
> plumbing
> > goes away.
> I think this is either unwieldy or inefficient. Imagine a large library
> containing lots of these things which need to be initialised if used.
> Then
> I predict that one of two things will happen
> (a) people will end up writing boilerplace code at the start of the
> main
> action which does
> initialise1
> initialise2
> ... blah blah ...
> (b) (more likely). There will be a single initialisation function for
> the
> library, which initialises everything, even the stuff you don't
> actually
> want.
>
To me this seems perfectly fine. Ian's proposal gets us TWIs, which I
can see the need for. Implicit initialisation (i.e. stateful
initialisation functions happening non-deterministicly, like java
static{} blocks or C++'s similar feature) is a can of worms I currently
see no value in opening.
Jules
More information about the Haskell-Cafe
mailing list