[Haskell-cafe] Re: [Haskell] Re: Global Variables and IO
ahey at iee.org
Mon Nov 8 12:45:17 EST 2004
On Monday 08 Nov 2004 3:57 pm, Keith Wansbrough wrote:
> [posted to haskell-cafe per SLPJ's request]
> Hi Adrian,
> > I can assure you that for the intended applications of oneShot it
> > is vital that realInit is executed once at most, but the user must
> > So please, no more handwaving arguments about this kind of thing
> > being unnecessary, bad programming style, or whatever..
> > Please show me a concrete alternative in real Haskell code, other
> I'm mystified as to why you are insisting others provide real examples when
> you are not.
Maybe you should read the whole thread. AFAIK I am the only person who
has provided a concrete example of anything, and I did so in direct response
to a request to do so from Keaan IIRC.
Unfortunately my own requests for counter examples showing that there are
safer (easier, more elegant or whatever) solutions have been ignored (not
that I'm in the least bit surprised by this). Instead all I get is repeated
denial of the reality of this problem.
The problem is simple enough to restate for anyone who's interested.
"Provide a simple reliable mechanism to ensure that in a given
program run one particular top level IO operation cannot be executed
more than once."
> Can you give one concrete example of an "intended application
> of oneShot", so that we can either propose a concrete Haskell
> implementation of it, or agree that global variables really are necessary.
Any C library which requires an explicit initialisation call before anything
in that library can be used (common enough IME). Accidental re-initialisation
(e.g. by two independent modules/libraries) will destroy any state currently
be used by the libraries existing "clients".
The need to do this may or may not indicate "bad design" on the part of the
library author. But so what? It just happens to be a fact that must be dealt
with from Haskell (in a safe manner preferably).
More information about the Haskell-Cafe