[Haskell-cafe] Re: Is it possible to read existential types?
ccshan at post.harvard.edu
Thu Apr 29 14:02:06 EDT 2004
On 2004-04-29T11:50:48-0400, S. Alexander Jacobson wrote:
> But isn't the point of this code that you don't
> need that type signature? If I knew in advance
> that it was an Integer then I wouldn't need to
> passs "Integer" in the list.
In the context in which the code was originally written, the point
was not that you don't need that type signature. Your comment above
helped me understand what you want, I think.
Edit this signature at http://www.digitas.harvard.edu/cgi-bin/ken/sig
BBC News: Universities face week of protest
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Size: 187 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://www.haskell.org//pipermail/haskell-cafe/attachments/20040429/94f0e8d1/attachment.bin
More information about the Haskell-Cafe