Why not haskell?
Tue, 9 Sep 2003 08:54:57 -0700 (PDT)
--- Mark Carroll <firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote:
> On Thu, 4 Sep 2003, Nick Name wrote:
> > I am just curios to hear from people who do not use haskell for project
> > releases, or just think it's not suitable for a mature project, what
> > exactly they find bad in current haskell implementations, or perhaps in
> > the standard.
> We're not really there yet, but we're likely to have to code stuff that
> works fast, guaranteed, with low overhead - for instance, in real-time
> embedded systems for military sensor data processing. I don't know where
> Haskell currently is, but I'm far from certain that it's up to that task.
What about Embedded Gofer? ;-) "Lambdas in the Liftshaft"
by Malcolm Wallace.
Then there's the DARPA-funded Project Timber at OGI: