"interact" behaves oddly if used interactively
njn25 at cam.ac.uk
Thu Oct 2 10:52:50 EDT 2003
On Wed, 1 Oct 2003, Robert Ennals wrote:
> Haskell is a good language, pureness is good, type classes are good,
> monads are good - but laziness is holding it back.
I have often wondered how much simpler the various Haskell implementations
would be if they used strict evaluation. It seems like laziness
complicates implementations tremendously; the STG-machine paper makes my
If laziness is really getting you down, you could try Mercury -- it is
pure, strict and has type classes, although it has no built-in monad
handling. I seem to remember seeing something about it having some
support for explicitly-marked laziness, but I might be wrong about that.
More information about the Haskell-Cafe