Thu, 8 May 2003 10:39:38 +0300
> I don't know if this answers your question, but the class of primitive
> recursive programs is not the largest class of provably terminating
> programs there is.
> For example, I can very easily produce a programming language which
> consists of primitive recursive programs plus these five other specific
> programs which I happen to know always terminate because I proved
> it by other means.
That's a good example. So how much can we expand this class? Is it possible
to cover all recursive languages, or is there a theorem that says this is