Type design question

Andrew J Bromage ajb@spamcop.net
Wed, 30 Jul 2003 14:04:22 +1000

G'day all.

On Tue, Jul 29, 2003 at 12:11:29PM +0200, Konrad Hinsen wrote:

> I think that C++ was a lot worse, even the accepted features (e.g. templates) 
> didn't work the same with all compilers. All non-trivial code came with a 
> list of supported compilers.

True.  If we had more Haskell implementations, we might be in the
same boat.

Our situation is much simpler.  Code is either written for Haskell 98,
or for "Glasgow extensions".

Andrew Bromage