Yet Another Monad Tutorial
Bayley, Alistair
Alistair_Bayley@ldn.invesco.com
Tue, 12 Aug 2003 11:14:32 +0100
Thanks. Quite comprehensive.
Peter Van Roy (the Mozart/Oz guy) said this on the PragProg list, and I
didn't have the knowledge to respond. It's a point you might want to
address, perhaps in this section?:
http://www.nomaware.com/monads/html/laws.html#nowayout
I can't decide for myself if he's right or not. It seems to me that monadic
IO functions aren't pure, but that doesn't mean that *all* monadic functions
are impure, does it?
Or could you argue that monadic IO functions are pure: it's just that their
input includes the outside world, which means that you can never invoke an
IO function more than once with the same arguments?
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
> Care to explain why you think Haskell is not pure?
Purely functional = you are always defining and calling pure functions.
Calling a pure function with the same arguments always gives the same
results. In Haskell, if monadic state is used, then this is not true
(there is support from the syntax + type system to hide the state
argument). So Haskell's monadic state is an implementation of state
*on top of* a purely functional language.
Saying that Haskell is 'purely functional' is reasonable if you want
to present it to non-functional programmers. But the reality is not
that simple. It's perhaps better to say that Haskell allows a clear
separation of the purely functional core from the rest, which is a
Good Thing.
It's like saying that Erlang is a functional language. It's true
that Erlang has a functional core. But the concurrent message
passing built on top is very important and definitely not functional!
Peter
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Jeff Newbern [mailto:jnewbern@yahoo.com]
> Sent: 12 August 2003 10:41
> To: haskell-cafe@haskell.org
> Subject: Yet Another Monad Tutorial
>
>
> Hello everyone,
>
> Due to the scarcity of monad tutorials available (:^), I have
> written one of my own. I hope that this one is both more gentle
> and more comprehensive than many of the other tutorials out on
> the 'net, and I am looking for feedback from experienced
> Haskellers and novices alike.
>
> You can find the tutorial at
>
> http://www.nomaware.com/monads/html/
>
> The tutorial begins from first principles and introduces the monad
> concept, details the implementation and usage of all of the standard
> monads in Haskell and the monad template library and explains the
> use of monad transformers. The tutorial contains 23 individual
> sections and 18 files of example code illustrating different monad
> concepts.
>
> I hope that this tutorial is useful to many people, and I would
> love to hear your experiences and suggestions for improving it.
>
> Thanks,
> Jeff Newbern
> jnewbern@yahoo.com
*****************************************************************
The information in this email and in any attachments is
confidential and intended solely for the attention and use
of the named addressee(s). This information may be
subject to legal professional or other privilege or may
otherwise be protected by work product immunity or other
legal rules. It must not be disclosed to any person without
our authority.
If you are not the intended recipient, or a person
responsible for delivering it to the intended recipient, you
are not authorised to and must not disclose, copy,
distribute, or retain this message or any part of it.
*****************************************************************